Late to say goodbye, but no less sad to hear the news... It's longer than I remember since I first crossed paths with him on usenet, then here. R.I.P. foxidrive, or better yet, -- Regards, Mic, as you used to sign off.
Liviu
Search found 470 matches
- 28 Jan 2017 22:02
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Foxidrive has left us
- Replies: 44
- Views: 211861
- 29 Nov 2015 02:47
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: revamped forum
- Replies: 38
- Views: 43979
Re: revamped forum
Is there a legend to the new icons in the main forum list? I'd guess that "white" = "read", "white+dot" = "posted into", and "blinking" is "heavier" than "static" though not sure how "weight" is assessed.
Liviu
Liviu
- 10 Nov 2015 20:29
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: About codepage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13622
Re: About codepage
I've not read all in your links but it seems they're referring only to utf-8, not 16, that is what i want to achieve. Not so, check $chrW.cmd in http://www.dostips.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=33810#p33810 (which is part of the 1st link I posted). If you want to hardcode Unicode strings in the batch f...
- 09 Nov 2015 11:10
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: About codepage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13622
Re: About codepage
i've discovered that the "chcp 65001" i was using enables the unicode 8 bit, while characters on the linked website are in the unicode 16 bit. Technically UTF-8 and UTF-16 are both Unicode encodings. Also note that running batch files under "chcp 65001" does not work at all unde...
- 25 Aug 2015 20:54
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Terminal font & codepage 437
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12311
Re: Terminal font & codepage 437
So the choice of the raster font is the worst choice to make if you want to write an application that is executed in the same way on different PCs around the world? Pretty much, yes. and so in the case of raster fonts choosing the codepage it is irrelevant? As far as output goes, yes. The active co...
- 20 Aug 2015 10:35
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Terminal font & codepage 437
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12311
Re: Terminal font & codepage 437
Terminal is a raster font, and is codepage specific. In your case the OEM codepage of the Windows installation is 850, and Terminal matches Lucida Console under chcp 850. That's the expected behavior, see for example http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/chcp...
- 28 Mar 2015 22:01
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Functional carriage return literal within a batch script!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 28544
Re: Functional carriage return literal within a batch script
But I was curious to see if I could demonstrate that carriage returns truly are stripped after normal expansion. So I did an experiment. Nicely done. Also, obvious as it may be, here is a quick experiment to verify that CRs are stripped before special characters are processed. @echo off & setlo...
- 24 Mar 2015 00:16
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation policy works wrong
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11279
Re: NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation policy works wrong
So, on Win7 I see that fsutil really has a bug. On the same time OS do it right and create 8.3 names on Boot (but not a system) volume Confirmed. Based on the added info, in the case of "fsutil 8dot3name set 3" there appear to be: - one bug in fsutil not recognizing the "system drive...
- 23 Mar 2015 12:06
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation policy works wrong
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11279
Re: NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation policy works wrong
So, 8dot3 policy works not as described in MSDN. I don't see the problem based on what you quoted. SFN creation is disabled on C: because, as fsutil notes at the end of the last line, C: is a "non-system volume". Confusing as it may be, but the "system volume" is not necessarily...
- 22 Mar 2015 00:15
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Is there an explanation for the result of SET/P and CLIP?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11467
Re: Is there an explanation for the result of SET/P and CLIP
There are also these results in other versions of Windows? I use Win7. Confirmed in Win7 x64, as well as Server 2012 R2 (thus likely Windows 8.1, too). (Just as a side note, next time please specify which particular program you pasted into, since that may be relevant in other cases.) Here though, t...
- 19 Mar 2015 17:34
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: create dummy files of exact size
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21369
Re: create dummy files of exact size
Hi Sponge, the jScript code you call through cScript, is not an abbreviation for JavaScript. jScript is Microsoft's response to java which was popular in the 90's. Java was never specifically written to be run inside browsers, this misuse led to security weaknesses. To address these issues javaScri...
- 09 Mar 2015 09:06
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: echoing other language texts?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10446
Re: echoing other language texts?
'cmd /u' does indeed turn " the output of internal commands to a pipe or file " to be Unicode, but it does not affect (or matter for) the console output itself - which was the original question here. The following will work correctly at a plain 'cmd' prompt as long as it's set to use a TT ...
- 08 Mar 2015 22:10
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: echoing other language texts?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10446
Re: echoing other language texts?
@OperatorGK, that works indeed if one only needs characters from one single codepage, such as Cyrillic 866. However, I took OP's question to be about mixing multiple scripts in the same batch, which can't be done via chcp alone - for example, there is no one codepage to cover both Cyrillic and Greek...
- 07 Mar 2015 22:02
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: echoing other language texts?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10446
Re: echoing other language texts?
In XP and earlier it's only possible if you already have an environment variable or a file/directory name containing those characters. In Windows 7 or later it's possible to build such strings in code from scratch, see http://www.dostips.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5358 and http://www.dostips....
- 19 Feb 2015 23:33
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: More fun with redirection and file handles
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14448
Re: More fun with redirection and file handles
- Reading from an output handle fails simply returns nothing (fails?), but there is no error message. 0<&1 set /p "ln=Why does read from output handle not generate an error message?" Focusing on just this tiniest bit of your whole exercise, but I think line-oriented input assumes an i...