Search found 66 matches
- 18 Apr 2016 11:00
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: We can use bash in our scripts now in Win10
- Replies: 20
- Views: 36111
We can use bash in our scripts now in Win10
With new Win10 update it's now possible to execute bash (or sh) scripts from command line. I made a simple hybrid bat-bash file which works fine for me on Windows 10 Build 14316: @goto :batch_part # Bash part echo Hello from bash! echo Normal syntax for variable expansion doesnt work here: %a% echo ...
- 30 Mar 2016 13:57
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: NEWS: UBUNTU IS COMING TO WIN10 (bash included)
- Replies: 0
- Views: 7311
NEWS: UBUNTU IS COMING TO WIN10 (bash included)
Today on Build conference Microsoft and Canonical announced that Ubuntu will be integrated into Win10. After the next major update we can use bash and other linux command-line programs natively!
Proof & More details: http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/03/ ... ndows.html
Proof & More details: http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/03/ ... ndows.html
- 03 Nov 2015 02:08
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Definition and use of arithmetic "functions" in Batch files
- Replies: 27
- Views: 40039
Re: Definition and use of arithmetic "functions" in Batch fi
Then, why you introduced it in a thread whose purpose is to write something in the way most other programming languages does? In the opening post you used the words: a method that allows to use arithmetic expressions in Batch files in a way rather similar to arithmetic functions of other programmin...
- 02 Nov 2015 13:07
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Alternative to CHOICE - need help
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9597
Re: Alternative to CHOICE - need help
Read this thread: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6382 and rework posted code to suit your needs.
- 01 Nov 2015 10:32
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Definition and use of arithmetic "functions" in Batch files
- Replies: 27
- Views: 40039
Re: Definition and use of arithmetic "functions" in Batch fi
penpen wrote:I must admit i never heard of a programming language that "naturally" supports this operator
Isn't this basically batch %x:y=z% operator? The only difference, AFAIK, is that [] operator may be used in anonymous expressions.
- 27 Oct 2015 01:15
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Definition and use of arithmetic "functions" in Batch files
- Replies: 27
- Views: 40039
Re: Definition and use of arithmetic "functions" in Batch fi
Can they be nested?
- 24 Oct 2015 12:10
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Best trick 2 avoid control-break(Terminate batch job) prompt
- Replies: 19
- Views: 30728
Re: Best trick 2 avoid control-break(Terminate batch job) pr
This question is extremely old now, however, someone resurrected it 2015. No need to HEX edit CMD.EXE etc... Someone mentioned a restart too(?) The solution that I found to block CTRL+C aka Terminate Batch Y/N COMPLETELY. No Fuss, No kidding, No Breaking Out. XOUT but that too can be disabled. Brie...
- 23 Oct 2015 11:33
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Best trick 2 avoid control-break(Terminate batch job) prompt
- Replies: 19
- Views: 30728
Re: Best trick 2 avoid control-break(Terminate batch job) pr
How you can use XCOPY for keyboard input? Never known that. dostips: how to display password in asterisk The main part to get a single character is done by Xcopy /W "%~f0" "%~f0" 2>Nul The other stuff is to build a complete string and to handle things like !, & and backspace...
- 23 Oct 2015 10:01
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Best trick 2 avoid control-break(Terminate batch job) prompt
- Replies: 19
- Views: 30728
Re: Best trick 2 avoid control-break(Terminate batch job) pr
Squashman wrote:Why doesn't Control-C kill a batch file when it is using xcopy for input?
How you can use XCOPY for keyboard input? Never known that.
- 31 Aug 2015 09:53
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Experimenting on User Input....
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11459
Re: Experimenting on User Input....
Meerkat wrote:OperatorGK wrote:Strangely, this doesn't do anything on my Win10. What Windows version you are using?
Just type SC in the console first if it exists.
Meerkat
I meant, SC exists and works, but "for..." command simply doesn't do anything.
- 31 Aug 2015 02:47
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Experimenting on User Input....
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11459
Re: Experimenting on User Input....
Strangely, this doesn't do anything on my Win10. What Windows version you are using?
- 15 Aug 2015 12:09
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
- Replies: 53
- Views: 103922
Re: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
_npocmaka, I tried with different %anonymous% variable value, but this thing prints nothing for me: @echo off setlocal set "anonymous=/?" for /l %%N in (1 1 5) do ( set /a N=%%N*2 call :%%anonymous%% a b c 3>&1 >nul ) if "%0" == ":%anonymous%" ( set "anonymous#...
- 15 Aug 2015 06:23
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
- Replies: 53
- Views: 103922
Re: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
slower when used in small scripts
What developers of cmd.exe smoked? Cause I don't know HOW to code something that works slower when used in small script.
Also, it's speed decreases with memory usage - avg. 15 sec with 1MB used, but 90 sec with 4MB used on my computer.
- 14 Aug 2015 14:02
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
- Replies: 53
- Views: 103922
Re: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
I was thinking of something similar, but was stumped until I saw your attempt Here is an improvement. Instead of using %1 which could be spoofed, I rely on the %0 value, which I think is difficult (if not impossible) to fake. I also opted to name the variable "private" instead of "h&...
- 14 Aug 2015 13:34
- Forum: DOS Batch Forum
- Topic: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
- Replies: 53
- Views: 103922
Re: Rules for label names vs GOTO and CALL
external access It is possible! I thought not . Someone, please dump all awesome stackoverflow things here or, at least, make a list. Also, I made some nice syntax: set LF=^ set exports=^^^%LF%%LF%^%LF%%LF% Use like this: :function %exports% library.bat %* Sadly "%*" can't be removed.