JSORT.BAT v4.2 - Case sensitive sort with option for numeric sort

[goldfish]

applaud your effort in creating a "native" solution to sort, however, a compiled tool is always "faster" than a script engine. There's a GNU win32 sort in http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/coreutils.htm, also, windows have sort as well..

[foxidrive]

applaud your effort in creating a "native" solution to sort,

Yes, it's very useful with the various options, and especially for people that cannot install third party tools due to policies.

however, a compiled tool is always "faster" than a script engine. There's a GNU win32 sort in http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/coreutils.htm, also, windows have sort as well..

Dave's tool can also do things that Windows sort is unable to do.

[Squashman]

applaud your effort in creating a "native" solution to sort, however, a compiled tool is always "faster" than a script engine. There's a GNU win32 sort in http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/coreutils.htm, also, windows have sort as well..

There are always reasons why people write the scripts that they do. It wasn't about speed. It was about functionality. If you read Dave's original post I think he explains that very well.

Hi Brian.

[goldfish]

Not forgetting that modern Windows also comes with Powershell installed by default. I am sure one could also use that power for sorting. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr ... 76968.aspx

[Squashman]

Not forgetting that modern Windows also comes with Powershell installed by default. I am sure one could also use that power for sorting. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr ... 76968.aspx

The other main point of JSORT is that it is a hybrid BATCH/Jscript. Hard to do that with powershell. There is a running thread about that topic.

[goldfish]

Not forgetting that modern Windows also comes with Powershell installed by default. I am sure one could also use that power for sorting. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr ... 76968.aspx

The other main point of JSORT is that it is a hybrid BATCH/Jscript. Hard to do that with powershell. There is a running thread about that topic.

Why would powershell need a hybrid? I don't understand.

[Squashman]

Why would powershell need a hybrid? I don't understand.

Please ask that question in this thread.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5543
Or this thread.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5526

[foxidrive]

Hi Brian.

Bingo.

[goldfish]

Hi Brian.

Bingo.

what's up long time no see hope you missed me.

[goldfish]

Remove that hybrid and do everything in jscript or vbscript. running in one process is better than spawning different processes.

[foxidrive]

Dave, given data like this:

Code: Select all

Cat on a hot tin roof (2003).txt
101 (nutty) dalmations (1996).txt
Short Circuit (1999).txt

Can jsort use a negative token so that the names can be sorted by the date terms and it returns this?

Code: Select all

101 (nutty) dalmations (1996).txt
Short Circuit (1999).txt
Cat on a hot tin roof (2003).txt

I haven't looked at the code to see how you've implemented it - thought you might like the idea to add to Jsort.

[dbenham]

Good idea - I may implement that feature in the near future.

But until then, you can still easily get your desired result if you preprocess the text with JREPL to encode all token delimiters except for the last one, do the sort, and then use JREPL to decode the original delimiters:

Code: Select all

jrepl "\\ \((?=.*\()" "\s \p" /t " " /f test.txt | jsort /d "(" /t 2 | jrepl "\\s \\p" "\ (" /t " "

Dave Benham

[foxidrive]

Much appreciated Dave!

After checking what each segment does I'm a little curious why the slashes were encoded.

There's an anomaly though too - can you see why these items sorted in this way?

Code: Select all

Alpha and Omega (2010).aaa
A-Team, The (2010).mmm
Alice in Wonderland (2010).mmm
Alien Raiders (2010).mmm
All Good Things (2010).mmm
Arctic Predator (2010).mmm

The alpha sort at the beginning of the line isn't quite right, but it does do an admirable job and is fine for what I need it for.

I changed the extensions to keep it more low key, but they are avi and mkv and the first character is correct.

[Compo]

There's an anomaly though too - can you see why these items sorted in this way?

Code: Select all

Alpha and Omega (2010).aaa
A-Team, The (2010).mmm
Alice in Wonderland (2010).mmm
Alien Raiders (2010).mmm
All Good Things (2010).mmm
Arctic Predator (2010).mmm

The alpha sort at the beginning of the line isn't quite right, but it does do an admirable job and is fine for what I need it for.

My suggestion is it's sorting priorities are year, alphabet extension, alphabet name

[dbenham]

After checking what each segment does I'm a little curious why the slashes were encoded.

Just in case the source file alredy contains slashes. I know they are not present in your example, but it could happen, especially if your file contains full paths instead of just file names.

There's an anomaly though too - can you see why these items sorted in this way?

Code: Select all

Alpha and Omega (2010).aaa
A-Team, The (2010).mmm
Alice in Wonderland (2010).mmm
Alien Raiders (2010).mmm
All Good Things (2010).mmm
Arctic Predator (2010).mmm

The alpha sort at the beginning of the line isn't quite right, but it does do an admirable job and is fine for what I need it for.

I changed the extensions to keep it more low key, but they are avi and mkv and the first character is correct.

I don't see the problem. The /T option does not specify that only one token is sorted. It simply is part of the equation that determines the beginning position that is used for sorting. Each line is sorted based on the year through the end of the line. The content before the year is simply ignored. Of course (2010).aaa sorts before (2010).mmm. But all files that end with (2010).mmm are ties and the order for them is undefined.

I briefly toyed with the idea of adding a feature where JSORT could parse each line into multiple fields, and then you could specify the sort order and precedence for each field individually. But I quickly abandoned that line of thought and opted to keep it simple.


Dave Benham